Brave marketing (the two sentences I read before the I hit download) had me think each website would be an island on its own with the claim of blocking cross-site trackers/cookies. My issue is Google. Using Brave, I logged into Drive and did not log out. Now, I visit YouTube and see I am logged in. Both websites are Google products and use the same login. I’m pretty sure YouTube simply accessed their parent domain Google to obtain my cookie. I’ve blocked these cross-domain cookies for years using NoScript extension on Firefox browser. Yes, web functionality breaks down when you force a website to only load from the top level URL, but I’ve learned from experience these websites will load contingency html that provides an experience ranging between excellent with site-specific cookies down to legacy pages more suited to a flip phone mobile browser. Brave is doing a good thing by maintaining website functionality and blocking trackers, but did not go far enough in this one instance where Google did the whole web. My straightforward advice is take a firm stance on blocking cross site tracking cookies, even those you may have thought to leave in for conveniences.
system
Closed
2
This topic was automatically closed after 30 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cross-site tracker blocking needs a different approach | 2 | 590 | February 29, 2020 | |
Tracking and fingerprinting protection seems to be failing | 3 | 399 | December 23, 2020 | |
New User coming from Google/Outlook Service | 6 | 441 | May 1, 2023 | |
Tracker Blocking | 2 | 751 | December 15, 2022 | |
I used to be able to log into Youtube with cross-site cookies off, now i don't | 3 | 981 | September 19, 2022 | |
Brave tracking protection vs. Privacy Badger
|
4 | 9177 | July 6, 2020 | |
Signing in on Youtube.com takes me to Youtube.com/oops | 3 | 2931 | March 14, 2022 | |
Need finer control over cross-site trackers | 11 | 875 | October 18, 2023 |