I don’t know what could happen if you store the Brave’s user data in a place like that.
You would have to use --user-data-dir=
and done, you could change every icon to include it and then change registry keys so when you click a link it will also open in the same user data.
But I don’t know how a Chromium browser will act when using veracrypt behind it, I have never used veracrypt, so only you can see if it could cause issues to have Brave installed in your system and then the user data in there. If it causes issues, I guess you can test it by having the browser and user data in the same virtual drive thing.
But technically, if a thief can’t log in your computer, then they can’t do much with it, if they extract the disk or try to see the files, then Chromium already encrypted cookies, passwords and the sensitive stuff about you, which will not work unless they are opened by someone in that computer, that’s why it is important to have a strong authentication if you are afraid someone might steal your data, like secure keys or Windows hello (fingerprinting or face recognition) should be easy and effective, the other non-sensitive data like history, bookmarks and all that is not encrypted.
PS. Please don’t listen to ‘others’ suggestion nonsense like “3rd party password manager” when LastPass is an example of security breaches about them, also, you always need a server to use those password manager, hosted by your or anyone else. how is that better for security is beyond me, it is just people who are gullible enough to buy a service that is not necessary.
If you want to use a password manager, then use KeePass, which is offline and runs in your computer and doesn’t care about internet connection.
These people suggestion third-party password managers, are the ones who have no evidence of any security breach with current Chromium password implementation, which runs offline, and doesn’t require any server to be hosted. it works with the system encryption, and that would be its only negative, but then, OS authentication methods are pretty advanced and that’s why I said you should make sure your computer is secured enough if you want everything else to be secured.
I wish people would not talking these ‘third party is better’ nonsense, when there is no evidence Chromium password management implementation have been breached in any way or form, nobody has shown a vulnerability when you can open the encrypted passwords in another system or anything, in fact, the ONLY way to open the same passwords in another system is by using sync, in the face of Brave, only Brave can decrypted by having the Sync Code, if nobody has the Sync Code or Brave browser, then, nothing is going to be accessed in any way, how is that less secured?
Just read, these people, “you’re not tethered to a specific ecosystem or browser.” which means you have to store them in the cloud for you to do that… yeah, so safe and secure /s