Hi. I’ve been looking once again for a more lightweight browser, as Chrome/Firefox take over a minute to notice a click on the only computer, a 512MB 686, that survived a recent lightning strike, and Brave came onto my horizon. I started compiling it - by golly it’s big! - but on a 512MB platform it was hopeless (it says it needs 6GB to compile) so I went for the downloads, something I rarely do, to find that it’s distributed in 64-bit only for Linux while I run 32-bit userlands on a 64-bit kernel (smaller and faster and no process needs >4GB to itself).
So my request is, might the release team add 32-bit Linux to the list of supported architectures? I know my specific case is unusual, probably unique but, for a browser where one of the plus features is smaller size, I think that also distributing a tarball for 32-bit Linux systems would be useful and, unless 64/32-bit portability issues arise, relatively little extra work.
Thanks & keep up the good work
M